Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Otolaryngologia Pols...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

[Neck reoperations in patients with laryngeal, lingual and tonsillar neoplasms].

Authors: Z, Szmeja; M, Wierzbicka; A, Kruk-Zagajewska;

[Neck reoperations in patients with laryngeal, lingual and tonsillar neoplasms].

Abstract

One of the most common reasons of failure in head and neck cancer treatment are metastases in regional lymph nodes. Preoperative assessment of the neck lymphatic system is an important task, but even more crucial goal is to monitor the patients after initial operation or combined treatment. The frequency of nodal recurrences ranged from 9% to 23%. It constitute nearly 50% of all treatment failures in larynx, tongue and tonsil malignancies. There are different methods of therapy in nodal recurrence treatment, but the most recommended, easily accessible and widely used is surgery. The group of 2134 patients (1580--larynx cancer, 286--tongue and floor of mouth cancer, 268--tonsil cancer) treated between 1987-1997 were operated in ENT Dept. of K. Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences in Poznań. In 269 patients were detected the nodal recurrence. In 149 cases the recurrence was homolateral, in 48 heterolateral, in 71 patients the neck was not previously treated. 152 patients were irradiated on the neck fields just after primary surgery. The rate of recurrences was 12.6%. Authors analysed and compared the percentage of recurrences for different primary lesions: larynx, tongue and tonsil neoplasms. The period of time from the last control examination to the moment of recurrence detection, its frequency on particular nodal levels, number of recurrences and trends between years 1992-1997 were assessed. 208 patients who developed nodal recurrence had surgical salvage, 59 patients were not qualified to surgery because of the lesion extension. Neck re-operations were divided into 3 main types: selective, modified radical and radical neck dissection. The frequency of particular neck dissection types, curative rates and difficulties of performing the salvage surgery were discussed.

Keywords

Reoperation, Catchment Area, Health, Tonsillar Neoplasms, Humans, Poland, Laryngeal Neoplasms, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies, Tongue Neoplasms

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research