Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The gastric mucosal barrier.

Authors: J L, Werther;

The gastric mucosal barrier.

Abstract

Most gastroduodenal ulcer disease results from a weakness in the normal gastric mucous barrier against the penetration of acid secreted by the stomach. Based on meticulous and insightful research, the distinguished physiologist Franklin Hollander hypothesized that the stomach is protected against its own acid secretion by a dynamic two-component mucus-mucosal barrier. Hollander and his co-workers defined the physical and chemical characteristics of the mucus components of this barrier, as well as the defense provided by the surface epithelial cell layer, which he viewed as the second line of defense (the second component). Barrier investigators at Mount Sinai demonstrated the effects of impairment of barrier function with resultant increased back-diffusion of acid, and they defined the consequences of this acid penetration into the gastric epithelium. The contribution of these workers included important observations on the natural impermeability of the gastric corpus and fundus as well as the normally increased permeability of the antrum. They also presented evidence on the role of bile in duodenogastric reflux in gastric ulcer disease and the presence of impaired barrier function in patients with gastric ulcer and pernicious anemia. Further studies included demonstration that stress and carcinogens could disrupt the gastric mucosal barrier. Disruption of the barrier, in turn, was shown to allow carcinogenesis to occur by permitting the absorption of certain carcinogens which otherwise are warded off by the barrier. The Hollander two-component gastric mucosal barrier hypothesis has, in recent years, been increasingly validated by experimental data coming from other laboratories.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Gastric Acid, Gastric Mucosa, Physiology, Gastroenterology, Humans, History, 19th Century, New York City, History, 20th Century, Hospitals, General

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!