
handle: 10654/36913
En el año 2017 la Corte Constitucional hace extensivo la aplicación del procedimiento eutanásico a los niños, niñas y adolescentes, bajo el desarrollo del derecho a morir dignamente y en atención al principio de interés superior del menor. El Gobierno Nacional de acuerdo con los desarrollos jurisprudenciales indicados, reguló el derecho a morir dignamente de los niños, niñas y adolescentes mediante la Resolución 825 de 2018, indicando que solo podrán tener acceso a ello, los niños mayores de 12 años. En ese contexto se desenvuelve el presente artículo de investigación, cuyo objetivo general es analizar si la regulación colombiana del proceso eutanásico en niños, niñas y adolescentes respeta el derecho a morir dignamente, o si por el contrario al limitar el acceso a este a solo a los niños mayores de 12 años se esta vulnerando dicho derecho a la población de niños menores de doce años. Para el efecto se realiza un análisis de la regulación de Bélgica y Holanda, llegando a la conclusión de que no existen razones objetivas para que el legislador colombiano limite el acceso a la eutanasia a los niños menores de doce años. In 2017, the Constitutional Court extended the application of the euthanic procedure to children and adolescents, under the development of the right to die with dignity and in accordance with the principle of the best interests of the minor. The National Government, in accordance with the indicated jurisprudential developments, regulated the right to die with dignity for children and adolescents through Resolution 825 of 2018, indicating that only children over 12 years of age may have access to it. In this context, the present research article is developed, whose general objective is to analyze if the Colombian regulation of the euthanasia process in children and adolescents respects the right to die with dignity, or if, on the contrary, by limiting access to it only to children over 12 years of age are violating this right to the population of children under twelve. For this purpose, an analysis of the regulation of Belgium and the Netherlands is carried out, concluding that there are no objective reasons for the Colombian legislator to limit euthanasia access to children under the age of twelve. Pregrado
Boys, DERECHO A MORIR DIGNAMENTE, bet interests of the minor, NIÑOS - MUERTE, NIÑAS, HOMICIDIO POR PIEDAD, euthanasia, homicide for mercy, NIÑOS, ADOLESCENTES, girls and adolescents, DERECHO A MORIR, INTERÉS SUPERIOR DEL MENOR, Boys, girls and adolescents, euthanasia, right to die with dignity, bet interests of the minor, homicide for mercy., NIÑOS - EUTANASIA, EUTANASIA, right to die with dignity
Boys, DERECHO A MORIR DIGNAMENTE, bet interests of the minor, NIÑOS - MUERTE, NIÑAS, HOMICIDIO POR PIEDAD, euthanasia, homicide for mercy, NIÑOS, ADOLESCENTES, girls and adolescents, DERECHO A MORIR, INTERÉS SUPERIOR DEL MENOR, Boys, girls and adolescents, euthanasia, right to die with dignity, bet interests of the minor, homicide for mercy., NIÑOS - EUTANASIA, EUTANASIA, right to die with dignity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
