Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Repositorio Document...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Recurso extraordinario de revisión en el proceso de restitución de tierras

Authors: Fernández Barreto, David Iván;

Recurso extraordinario de revisión en el proceso de restitución de tierras

Abstract

El proceso de Restitución de Tierras consagrado en la ley 1448 de 2011, es un procedimiento mixto (por cuanto es el único proceso judicial en Colombia que involucra también una etapa administrativa.) de justicia transicional, enmarcado en la jurisdicción constitucional; transicional porque esta implementado para pasar de un estado generalizado de violencia a uno de paz, que centralmente fue implementado para un período determinado, con la finalidad de superar el estado de desplazamiento forzado y de despojo al que fueron sometidos los propietarios, poseedores y ocupantes de inmuebles como resultado del conflicto armado interno colombiano. Al constituir una medida de reparación a favor de las víctimas de estos hechos, regida por estándares internacionales de protección a población vulnerable, es necesario evitar que la jurisdicción ordinaria interna en su especialidad civil, que tiene a su cargo conocer el recurso extraordinario de revisión en el proceso de restitución de tierras por mandato del artículo 92 de la ley 1448 de 2011, aborde dicho recurso con el criterio tradicional con que se decide un proceso ordinario civil teniendo en cuenta que el enfoque jurídico con que se aborda el estudio de los casos en ambas categorías de asuntos (transicional y ordinaria), difiere por completo, especialmente en lo que tiene que ver con el análisis de la inversión de la prueba, de las presunciones y las facultades excepcionales otorgadas a los funcionarios judiciales de restitución de tierras, pues mientras estos últimos examinan los casos con una tendencia pro-víctima, en la jurisdicción ordinaria a la parte demandante le incumbe la carga de demostrar plenamente los supuestos de hecho en que basa sus pretensiones, tal como lo establece el artículo 167 del Código General del Proceso, principio de la carga probatoria que impera en procesos de naturaleza adversarial tradicional (ordinario), y cuya aplicación resulta inconveniente en tratándose de víctimas del conflicto armado, en atención a su condición de sujeto vulnerable y destinatario de una especial protección (que no puede ser re victimizado mediante la imposición de cargas procesales) The process of Restitution of Land enshrined in Law 1448 of 2011, is a mixed procedure (because it is the only judicial process in Colombia that also involves an administrative stage) of transitional justice, framed in the constitutional jurisdiction; Transitional because it is implemented to move from a generalized state of violence to a state of peace, which was centrally implemented for a given period, in order to overcome the state of forced displacement and dispossession to which the owners were subjected, as a result of the Colombian internal armed conflict. Constitutes a measure of reparation for the benefit of the victims of these events, which is governed by international standards of protection for vulnerable populations, therefore, it is necessary to avoid that ordinary internal jurisdiction in its civilian specialty, which is responsible for knowing the extraordinary review appeal in the process of restitution of land under mandate of article 92 of Law 1448 of 2011, study said resource with the traditional criterion with which an ordinary civil procedure is decided, taking into account that the legal approach to dealing with cases in both categories of issues (Transitional and ordinary), differs completely, especially as it relates to the analysis of the burden of judicial evidence, the presumptions and exceptional powers granted to judicial officials for restitution of land, because while they examine cases with a pro-victim tendency, in the ordinary jurisdiction the plaintiff has the burden of proving fully the factual assumptions on which it bases its claims, principle of the burden of proof that prevails in processes of traditional adversarial nature (ordinary), whose application is inconvenient in the case of victims of the armed conflict, because of its status as a vulnerable subject and recipient of special protection (which cannot be victimized by the imposition of procedural charges).

Country
Colombia
Related Organizations
Keywords

Ley de Víctimas y de Restitución de Tierras, Presunciones, Human Rights, Deng Principles, CONFLICTO ARMADO, Internal Armed Conflict, Pinheiro Principles, VICTIMAS DE DELITOS, Carga de la prueba, Víctimas, Jurisdicción Ordinaria, Ordinary Jurisdiction, Justicia Transicional, Probative assessment, Victims, Presumptions, Burden of proof, INDEMNIZACION JUDICIAL, Extraordinary review appeal on restitution Of land, Conflicto armado interno, Victims and Land Restoration Law, Recurso extraordinario de revisión en restitución de tierras, Principios Pinheiro, Medidas de reparación, Principios Deng, Derechos Humanos, Transitional Justice, Reparation measures, Valoración probatoria

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities