
Periodontal pocket depths and attachment loss are charted early in treatment to establish a benchmark against which the success of treatment regimens will be measured. They are considered both a measure of past inflammatory disease and a reservoir for periodontal pathogens capable of further destruction. The clinician must strive to identify predictable means of treating pockets. Three nonpharmaceutical approaches can be considered: maintain the present depth and hope for the best when treating a patient who has already demonstrated susceptibility; reduce the pocket by resective treatment, a frequently used and very predictable corrective methodology; reduce the probing depth by accomplishing periodontal regeneration. This last approach is the treatment of choice, but it is often impossible to achieve. This article describes a treatment regimen that recognizes the need for proper diagnosis and an initial nonsurgical debridement regimen before considering surgery. It then evaluates surgical treatment alternatives and concludes with a mandate for a well-constructed periodontal maintenance program. It also provides long-term detailed analysis of patient treatment.
Adult, Minerals, Bone Regeneration, Furcation Defects, Alveolar Bone Loss, Biocompatible Materials, Membranes, Artificial, Prognosis, Chronic Disease, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal, Dental Scaling, Humans, Periodontal Pocket, Female, Collagen
Adult, Minerals, Bone Regeneration, Furcation Defects, Alveolar Bone Loss, Biocompatible Materials, Membranes, Artificial, Prognosis, Chronic Disease, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal, Dental Scaling, Humans, Periodontal Pocket, Female, Collagen
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
