Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Radiological evaluation of complications of implantable venous access port systems].

Authors: A, Schlüter; K, Stock; A, von Poblozki; C, Behrmann; A, Jassoy; R P, Spielmann;

[Radiological evaluation of complications of implantable venous access port systems].

Abstract

Clinical signs and symptoms sometimes throw suspicion on functional complications and venous thrombosis due to implantable venous access ports. Objective was to determine frequency of these problems using radiologic imaging.61 patients were examined by means of fluoroscopy. If indication was given we injected radiopaque (contrast) medium. In the case of suspected vascular thrombosis the radiological finding was verified by sonography, phlebography or by venous magnetic resonance imaging angiography.Altogether 46 complications were documented in 37 out of 61 examined patients (61%). Occlusions of port-catheter were proved in 24 cases. It was the radiologically most frequently recorded complication (52%;) and found coincident with other problems in 9 patients (37%;). Pain frequently indicates break of catheters. Implantation of catheters into jugular and axillary veins predisposes to break of catheters just as port-catheters lateral implanted into subclavian veins ("pinch-off-sign").Functional tests of venous access systems using fluoroscopy and phlebography give information that helps to decide if clinically problematic port-systems should be used furthermore. Directions of catheter which are predestined to complications should be avoided.

Keywords

Venous Thrombosis, Catheters, Indwelling, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Fluoroscopy, Humans, Phlebography, Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!