
The so-called focal infections are today considered to be polyetiologic manifestations, in which there is a summation of various aggressions. Bacterial products, toxic or antigenic substances originating from different foci are but one of the elements susceptible of unleashing the disease. This explains why there are so many foci and so few results after their elimination. Scientific evidence shows that the histologic result of an apicectomy is considerably worse than the radiological evidence might lead to believe. Inflammation may persist for years before it disappears. Radiographs are therefore only a coarse criterion for judging results of healing. When facing a disease caused by focal infection, the possible foci should be eliminated quickly and as radically as possible.
Radiography, Focal Infection, Dental, Root Canal Obturation, Apicoectomy, Tooth, Follow-Up Studies
Radiography, Focal Infection, Dental, Root Canal Obturation, Apicoectomy, Tooth, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
