Evaluation results from prospective drug utilization review: Medicaid demonstrations.
Copyright policy )Evaluation results from prospective drug utilization review: Medicaid demonstrations.
In 1992 HCFA awarded two cooperative agreements for demonstrations of prospective drug utilization review (PDUR). Iowa tested an on-line prospective drug utilization review (OPDUR) system. Washington tested payments to pharmacists for providing non-dispensing "cognitive services" (CS). In this article the authors report on an evaluation of these demonstrations and on three assessments of retrospective drug utilization review (RDUR) interventions. The evaluation failed to detect effects of either State PDUR demonstration on the frequency of drug problems, utilization of prescription drugs and other health services, and clinical outcomes. However, the State RDUR interventions had immediate effects on prescribing physicians.
Washington, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Medicaid, Data Collection, State Health Plans, Pilot Projects, Iowa, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S., United States, Drug Utilization Review, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Costs and Cost Analysis
Washington, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Medicaid, Data Collection, State Health Plans, Pilot Projects, Iowa, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S., United States, Drug Utilization Review, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Costs and Cost Analysis
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).10 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!