Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Selective salpingography and transcervical tubal recanalization: technique, indications, results. Apropos of 53 proceedings].

Authors: N, Atallah; R, Karam;

[Selective salpingography and transcervical tubal recanalization: technique, indications, results. Apropos of 53 proceedings].

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalization as a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure when proximal tubal obstruction is present. Fifty-three procedures were performed between January 95 and March 98 in the Radiology Department of Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, on 53 infertile women aged between 25 and 43 years. Unilateral or bilateral obstruction was documented on hysterosalpingogram or by laparoscopy. The technique consisted of a direct fallopian tube catheterization, under fluoroscopy using an hydrophilic guidewire. Water soluble contrast material was used. Eighty-eight tubes were evaluated (35 with bilateral and 10 with unilateral obstruction, 8 single tubes). Recanalization was possible in 52 cases (97.5%). Twenty-nine patients were followed. Thirteen pregnancies were reported (45%). This pregnancy rate is however increased to 62% if we exclude the cases where other infertility problems coexisted. No complications occurred. Selective salpingography and fallopian tube catheterization is a non invasive successful technique that is extremely useful in the diagnosis and treatment of tubal obstruction in women with infertility problems. It can be performed immediately after an hysterosalpingogram when the fallopian tubes are not opacified.

Keywords

Adult, Time Factors, Fallopian Tube Diseases, Hysterosalpingography, Catheterization, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Infertility, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!