
handle: 10550/43093
Men prosecute happiness; we are born to be happy. But, what is happiness? There is no universally accepted answer. The purpose of this study is two-faced: 1st. To justify that there are certain minimum elements in every form of happiness; 2nd. That different historical, sociological, anthropological...reasons support the rational and reasonable defence of different objective models of happiness. As a proof, two different models (the Christian and the lay models of happiness) are described. We conclude that full happiness is a utopia, and advance as an adequate model the rational and reasonable employ of the ¿carpe diem¿ maxim.
Ciencias básicas y experimentales, UNESCO::FILOSOFÍA, :FILOSOFÍA [UNESCO], Humanidades, Hª y Fª de la Ciencia, Filosofía. Etica
Ciencias básicas y experimentales, UNESCO::FILOSOFÍA, :FILOSOFÍA [UNESCO], Humanidades, Hª y Fª de la Ciencia, Filosofía. Etica
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
