Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Identificación de variables predictivas de riesgo en la evaluación incial de la angina inestable.

Authors: Rueda Soriano, Joaquín;

Identificación de variables predictivas de riesgo en la evaluación incial de la angina inestable.

Abstract

RESUMEN Objetivo: 1. Conocer el perfil clínico y electrocardiográfico de los pacientes ingresados con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación persistente del segmento ST (SCASEST). 2. Incidencia de eventos adversos isquémicos intrahospitalarios. 3. Identificar las variables que obtenidas en el ingreso, sean predictivas de eventos adversos intrahospitalarios. 4. Analizar la incidencia de eventos adversos a largo plazo 5. Identificar las variables predictivas de eventos adversos isquémicos a largo plazo. Material y método: Estudio prospectivo observacional de los pacientes ingresados consecutivamente desde puertas de urgencias con diagnóstico de SCASEST. Se analizaron variables clínicas, electrocardiográficas y analíticas obtenidas en el momento del ingreso. Seguimiento clínico de 50 meses. Los eventos adversos intrahospitalarios fueron: angina recurrente, angina refractaria, arritmias ventriculares graves, infarto agudo de miocardio y muerte cardíaca. El evento adverso principal fue el combinado de muerte cardíaca o infarto. Se hizo un análisis descriptivo de las variables, expresando las cualitativas como porcentajes y las continuas como media ± desviación estándar. Se realizó un análisis de la varianza para las variables cuantitativas y 2 para las cualitativas. Las variables predictivas del evento principal en el análisis univariado y las consideradas clínicamente relevantes fueron introducidas en un modelo de regresión logística multivariada. Los eventos isquémicos analizados en el seguimiento fueron: infarto de miocardio y muerte cardíaca. El evento adverso principal fue el combinado de muerte cardíaca o infarto. El análisis univariado se realizó mediante el método de Kaplan-Meier y las diferencias entre las curvas se analizaron con el test de log-rank. Aquellas variables predictoras del evento principal en el análisis univariado y las consideradas clínicamente relevantes fueron introducidas en un modelo de regresión de Cox multivariado. Resultados: Ingresaron 494 pacientes con sospecha inicial de SCASEST, de los que 26 fueron diagnosticados de angina inestable secundaria y 53 de dolor torácico no isquémico. Los 415 pacientes restantes con diagnóstico de SCASEST definido (infarto agudo de miocardio 13.5% y angina inestable 86.5%) fueron los finalmente analizados. La incidencia de eventos intrahospitalarios fue: angina recurrente 26%, angina refractaria 14%, infarto de miocardio no fatal 1.9%, muerte cardíaca 2.7% y evento combinado 4.6%. Edad  70 años, descenso del segmento ST y niveles de fibrinógeno  385 mg/dl fueron predictores independientes del evento principal intrahospitalario. El seguimiento medio fue de 50 meses. Se registraron 54 muertes cardíacas (13.6%) y 33 infartos de miocárdio (8.2%). La incidencia de muerte o infarto (70 pacientes) fue del 17.3%. La edad  70 años, hipertensión arterial, diabetes, ictus previo, insuficiencia cardíaca Killip >I, insuficiencia renal, descenso del segmento ST y niveles de fibrinógeno  385 mg/dl fueron predictores independientes del evento pricipal en el seguimiento. Conclusiones: 1. Los pacientes con SCASEST presentan una elevada prevalencia de factores de riesgo y cardiopatía isquémica previa. La forma de presentación más frecuente es la tipo IIIB de Braunwald. En el momento del ingreso, el 30% no presentan alteraciones de la repolarización. 2. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue del 2.7% y la incidencia del evento combinado del 4.6%, presentándose más de la mitad de estos episodios en las primeras 48 horas. 3. Las variables predictoras independientes del evento combinado intrahospitalario fueron: edad  70 años, descenso del segmento ST y niveles de fibrinógeno 385 mg/dl. 4. Los pacientes con SCASEST presentan una elevada incidencia de complicaciones graves isquémicas durante los tres primeros meses tras el alta hospitalaria. Posteriormente, el pronóstico es bueno, comparable a la cardiopatía isquémica crónica estable. 5. Las variables predictivas independientes del evento principal a largo plazo fueron: edad 70 años, diabetes mellitus, hipertensión arterial, insuficiencia renal, ictus previo, insuficiencia cardíaca Killip > I al ingreso, descenso del segmento ST y niveles de fibrinógeno 385 mg/dl. __________________________________________________________________________________________________

Background and purpose: Patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) constitute a heterogeneous population with variable outcomes. Risk stratification in this population is dificult due to the complexity in patient risk profile. We conducted this study to characterize the value of clinical and electrocardiographical variables for risk stratification in an unselected population of consecutive patients with NSTEACS on admission. Methods: We prospectively included 415 consecutive patients admitted with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (65±11 y.; 27% female) between November 1997 and July 1998 and looked for the combined end-point of cardiac death or myocardial infarction during hospitalization and at long-term (mean follow-up 50 months). Baseline clinical and electrocardiographical data as well as serum concentrations of CPK-MB, creatinine and fibrinogen were prospectively recorded. The Student t-test was applied for comparisons between continuous variables with normal distribution, the chi-squared test for categorical data, Kaplan-Meier curves (log-rank test) for survival analysis and the Cox regression model to investigate the effect of several variables upon the follow-up. Results: In-hospital cardiovascular mortality was 2.7% and the rate for the outcome of either cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was 4.6%. Independent predictors of in-hospital death or nonfatal myocardial infarction were age (65 years), ST segment depression and elevation of fibrinogen levels. The incidence of cardiovascular mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction at long term was of 17.3%. Significant multivariate predictors of long term mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction were age (65 years), ST segment depression, arterial hypertension, stroke, diabetes mellitus, Killip class  II at admission, renal dysfunction and elevation of fibrinogen levels. Conclusions: 1. The in-hospital prognosis of NSTEACS is good. However, patients discharged from hospital after clinical stabilization present an important number of ischemic complications during the following 3 months, similar to that presented by all patients during the acute phase. 2. Simple clinical, electrocardiographical and biochemical data obtained at hospital admission allow an accurate risk stratification of patients with NSTEACS.

Keywords

none

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green