Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In 2002 the ICES WGSSDS showed the difficulties in the assessment of hake due to uncertainty on age estimation of older fish which has led the WG to use a plus group at age 8. To solve these problems an otolith exchange was recommended between readers involved in the assessment and focused mainly on older fishes. Preliminary results of the fourth hake otoliths exchange, conducted in 2003, indicate that the age estimation criteria used up to age 3 was the one adopted previously, however, for older fishes, otolith interpretation presents a higher complexity. The results indicate that the precision of age readings has decreased and a strong bias has been found in age readings of older fishes. Thus, the values of APE and CV in (%) for all readers are 41, and 45 respectively, while the values for assessment readers are 24 and 32. The comparison of these results with those from the previous exchange in 2001 shows the difficulty of this task, and to solve these problems a specific international workshop will be carried out.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 26 | |
| downloads | 32 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts