
handle: 10498/29459
En este trabajo se desarrolla una hipótesis explicativa de las fases y mecanismos mentales involucrados en el proceso interpretativo de aquellos enunciados en los que la presencia de determinados elementos léxicos ambiguos da lugar a situaciones de doble interpretación, enuncidos bivalentes o puns, o que requieren de una doble operación de procesamiento para su correcta interpretación, enunciados de interpretación retroactiva o garden-path. Se analizan los distintos pasos del proceso interpretativo a que estos enunciados se ven sometidos en cada caso. Se defiende y argumenta la necesidad de construir un análisis que combine el estudio de los aspectos relativos a los procesos de acceso léxico de los distintos significados de la ambigüedad, responsabilidad de las teorías psicolingüísticas, y aquellos factores de carácter pragmático que seguidamente intervienen en la construcción de la interpretación resultante en cada caso. Las teorías psicolingüísticas de acceso múltiple y la teoría pragmática de la pertinencia sirven de marco teórico para construir una hipótesis explicativa.
This thesis develops an explanatory hypothesis about the phases and mental mechanisms involved in the interpretative process of utterances in which the presence of certain ambiguous lexical elements gives rise to a double interpretation, as in puns, or requires a double processing operation for the intended interpretation(s) to be built, as in garden-path utterances. The different steps of the interpretative process these utterances are subjected to in each case are exhaustively examined. We argue for the need to construct an analysis that combines the study of psycholinguistic aspects relative to the processes of lexical access to the different meanings of ambiguity and those factors of a pragmatic nature that subsequently intervene to determine the resulting interpretation in each case. Psycholinguistic theories of multiple lexical access and Relevance theory, a cognitive approach to communication, serve as the theoretical framework for constructing an explanatory hypothesis of these cases.
comunicación encubierta, procesamiento léxico, puns, covert communication, Lexical ambiguity, garden path, teoría de la pertinencia, pragmática, Ambigüedad léxica, lexical processing, Relevance theory
comunicación encubierta, procesamiento léxico, puns, covert communication, Lexical ambiguity, garden path, teoría de la pertinencia, pragmática, Ambigüedad léxica, lexical processing, Relevance theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
