
handle: 10495/10163
RESUMEN: En el presente trabajo se argumentan las razones por las cuales el binomio Cuniculus hernadezi Castro, López y Becerra, 2010, no constituye un nombre disponible de acuerdo a la reglamentación del vigente Código Internacional de Nomenclatura Zoológica (ICZN). Entre estas razones se encuentran la carencia de una descripción precisa y la no asignación de un ejemplar tipo. Adicionalmente, resaltamos problemas en el diseño de la investigación en la cual el binomio fue descrito, que afectan las conclusiones acerca de una distinción taxonómica entre las poblaciones de las cordilleras Oriental y Central de Colombia.
ABSTRACT: In this article we discuss the reasons why the bin omen Cuniculus hernandezi Castro, López y Bercerra, 2010, is not an available name according to the rules of the current International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). Among these reasons are the lack of a precise description of the taxon and the failure to identify a type specimen. In addition, we highlight problems in the research design of the description of the bin omen that affect the conclusions regarding the taxonomic distinctiveness between the populations of the populations of the Oriental and Cental Cordilleras of Colombia.
Cordillera Oriental (Colombia), 570, Taxonomía, Zoology - Nomenclature, tipo portanombre, QH301-705.5, nomenclatura, Cuniculus, taxonomía, 530, name-bearing type, taxonomy, Cordillera Central (Colombia), nomenclature, Biology (General), Zoología - Nomenclatura, Taxonomy
Cordillera Oriental (Colombia), 570, Taxonomía, Zoology - Nomenclature, tipo portanombre, QH301-705.5, nomenclatura, Cuniculus, taxonomía, 530, name-bearing type, taxonomy, Cordillera Central (Colombia), nomenclature, Biology (General), Zoología - Nomenclatura, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
