Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ EMU DSpacearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Punavetikad (Rhodophyta) Eesti vooluveekogudes

Red algae (Rhodophyta) in Estonian running waters
Authors: Kägi, Mari;

Punavetikad (Rhodophyta) Eesti vooluveekogudes

Abstract

There are practically no studies on freshwater red algae in Estonia. Consequently, data on red algae in Estonian rivers were studied. The aim of this study was to find out whether red algae occur somewhat more often in Estonian running waters than in other European rivers based on literature sources. Data on the distribution of red algae from Estonian rivers collected in thirty years (1987-2019) were used in the study. The dissertation found that in some cases red algae were found more than in other European rivers. Red algae taxa were found in almost 35% of the rivers studied in Estonia. Two groups of red algae with very different frequencies stood out: taxa with an incidence of 13-26% and taxa with an incidence of 1% or less. Taxa belonging to the first group (Batrachospermum gelatinosum, Lemanea sp., Hildenbrandia rivularis, Batrachospermum sp.) are also common elsewhere in Europe, except for H. rivularis. Of the taxa in the second group (Audouinella chalybea, L. cf. fucina, B. atrum and L. fluviatilis), some species are included in the Red Book of several countries. B. atrum deserves to be included in the Estonian Red Book, and in the case of L. fluviatilis further attention should be paid to the more precise definition of the species. The data of this work can be supplemented with the Estonian biodiversity and Pluto-F databases. The indication of red algae found should be further investigated and refined to help assess the status of watercourses.

Eestis praktiliselt puuduvad uuringud mageveeliste punavetikate kohta. Sellest tulenevalt uuriti Eesti jõgedes leiduvate punavetikate andmeid. Antud töö eesmärk oli välja selgitada, kas punavetikad esinevad Eesti vooluveekogudes mõnevõrra sagedamini kui kirjandusallikate põhjal Euroopa teistes jõgedes. Töös kasutati kolmekümne aasta (1987-2019) jooksul kogutud punavetikate levikuandmeid Eesti jõgedest. Lõputöös leiti, et punavetikaid leidus mõnevõrra rohkem kui Euroopa teistes jõgedes. Punavetikataksoneid leiti ligi 35% Eesti uuritud jõgedes. Eristusid kaks väga erineva esinemissagedusega punavetikate gruppi: taksonid, kelle esinemissagedus oli 13-26% ja taksonid, kelle esinemissagedus oli 1% piires või alla selle. Esimesse gruppi kuuluvad taksonid (Batrachospermum gelatinosum, Lemanea sp., Hildenbrandia rivularis, Batrachospermum sp.) on sagedased ka mujal Euroopas, va H. rivularis. Teise gruppi kuuluvatest taksonitest (Audouinella chalybea, L. cf. fucina, B. atrum ja L. fluviatilis) on mõned liigid lülitatud mitme riigi Punasesse raamatusse. B. atrum väärib Eesti Punasesse raamatusse lisamist ning L. fluviatilis puhul tuleks edaspidiselt tähelepanu pöörata liigi täpsemale määrangule. Antud töö andmetega saab täiendada Eesti elurikkuse ja Pluto-F andmebaase. Edaspidi tuleks uurida ja täpsustada leitud punavetikate indikaatorlust, mis aitaks kaasa vooluveekogude seisundi hindamisele.

Country
Estonia
Related Organizations
Keywords

punavetikad, bakalaureusetööd, esinemissagedus, vooluveekogud, Punane raamat

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 27
    download downloads 141
  • 27
    views
    141
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
27
141
Green
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center