Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ EMU DSpacearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Defoliatsiooni mõju aedmaasika (Fragaria ananassa) saagile

Effect of defoliation on strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) yield
Authors: Raamets, Riinu;

Defoliatsiooni mõju aedmaasika (Fragaria ananassa) saagile

Abstract

In strawberry production the aim is to reduce the use of chemicals. It is possible to fend off weeds by mulching and by defoliation. The objective of present research was to determine the influence of post-harvest defoliation by flaming leaves and adding biosimulant Humistar in a two and three-year- old plantation to cultivar ’Darselect’. The experiment with straberry cultivar Darselect was carried out at the Reasearch Centre of Organic Farming of Estoninan University of Life Sciences. The test results showed that double defoliation decreased the number of leaves and inflorescence number. After the second defoliation decreased up to 27% the number of inflorescences and leaf number up to 33%. Double defoliation reduced strawberry crown and root weight. Defoliation with Humistar had positive impact, although the results was not better compared to control variant. Defoliation had negative impact on the strawberry yield. In 2013 primary and secondary fruit mass decreased. Further, we could experiment one time defoliation in third year to examine the impact on the vitality of plants and yield, in order to obtain high quality of yields in fourth year.

Maasikate kasvatamisel soovitakse vähendada kemikaalide kasutamist. Umbrohtusid on võimalik tõrjuda multšimisega ning haiguseid ja kahjureid defoliatsiooni teel. Töö eesmärgiks oli välja selgitada kahe- ja kolmeaastaste sordi ’Darselect’ maasikataimede lehtede leegitamise ja biostimulaatori Humistar mõju leegitatud taimedele. Katsed viidi läbi 2011- 2013. aastal Eesti Maaülikooli katseaias maasikasordiga ’Darselect’. Esimese leegitamise järel vähenes lehtede arv ja kahekordse leegitamise järel vähenes lehtede (33 %) ja õisikute (27%) arv. Kahekordne leegitamine vähendas juurekaela ja juurte massi. Humistari lahusega kastmisel oli positiivne mõju leegitatud taimedele. Leegitamisel oli negatiivne mõju maasika saagikusele. 2013. aastal vähenes oluliselt primaasete ja sekundaarsete viljade viljamass. Edasiselt võiks katsetada ka ühekordset leegitamist 3. aastal ja uurida selle mõju taimede elujõule ja saagikusele, eesmärgiga saada kvaliteetset saaki ka neljandal aastal.

Country
Estonia
Related Organizations
Keywords

väetamine, bakalaureusetööd, maasikas, saagikus, defoliatsioon

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 23
    download downloads 78
  • 23
    views
    78
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
23
78
Green