Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The value of intracellular CD41 antigen detection to the diagnosis of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia].

Authors: J, Miki; K, Koike; N, Sawai; H, Matsuura; Y, Kurokawa; K, Sakashita; T, Nakazawa; +4 Authors

[The value of intracellular CD41 antigen detection to the diagnosis of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia].

Abstract

An 11-month-old boy was transferred to our hospital because of fever and bleeding tendency on March 13, 1998. Laboratory studies showed a white blood cell count of 43,360/microliter with 75% blasts, a hemoglobin concentration of 8.4 g/dl, and a platelet count of 23 x 10(3)/microliter. Surface marker analysis with a flow cytometer revealed that only 21% and 11% of the blasts, respectively, were positive for CD41 and CD42b. Treatment with a permeabilizing agent apparently increased the reactivity of the blasts with anti-CD41 monoclonal antibody (MoAb), which can recognize IIb independently of IIIa. However no significant differences were observed in reactivity with anti-CD41 MoAb (which recognizes the IIb/IIIa complex) anti-CD61 MoAb and anti-CD42b MoAb before or after fixation. Blasts positive for platelet peroxidase were observed by electron microscopy, thus confirming the diagnosis of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia. We concluded that the detection of intracellular antigens is useful for the quick diagnosis of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia characterized by low surface expression of megakaryocytic lineage antigens.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Remission Induction, Cytarabine, Infant, Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex, Leukemia, Megakaryoblastic, Acute, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Mitoxantrone, Megakaryocytes, Etoposide

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!