Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Repositorio Instituc...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Atentados multifocales y lecciones aprendidas

Authors: Blanco Hermo, Patricia;

Atentados multifocales y lecciones aprendidas

Abstract

Los atentados terroristas en los trenes del 11 de marzo de 2004 en Madrid desencadenaron una respuesta rápida y masiva de los equipos de emergencia prehospitalarios y de las autoridades. Casi todos los trabajos publicados que se refieren a la actuación son positivos, si bien hay aspectos que fallaron y deben ser reforzados. Cuando comparamos lo sucedido con otros atentados similares, como el sucedido en Londres el 7 de julio de 2005, la respuesta fue similar encontrando, en todos los casos, prácticamente los mismos errores y procedimientos a mejorar. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar las actuaciones llevadas a cabo por los sistemas de emergencia, comparando la actuación en Londres y Madrid, ver los puntos fuertes y los puntos de mejora, para extraer las lecciones aprendidas en aras a que no se repitan los mismos errores en el futuro, como ha sucedido en el reciente atentado del 22 de marzo de 2016 en Bruselas, donde los medios de comunicación refieren que hubo descoordinación, pudiendo nombrar que, a la vista de las noticias, parece que se han dado los mismos fallos que en Madrid y Londres(1).

The terrorist attacks on 11 march 2004 in Madrid triggered a swift and massive pre-hospital emergency and authorities response off. Almost every article that refers to the performance is positive, although there were some mismatches witch should be fixed. When we compare what happened in other similar attacks, like London on 7 july 2005 with Madrid, the response was similar finding, in all cases, similar mistakes and procedures to improve. The aim of this paper is to analyze the actions carried out by emergency systems, comparing the performance in London and Madrid, to see the strengths and areas for improvement, to extract lessons learned in order to that they are not repeated mistakes in the future, as has happened in the recent attack on 22 March 2016 in Brussels, where the media report that there was lack of coordination, may appoint that, in view of the news, seems to have given the same mistakes in Madrid and London (1).

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
Keywords

Preparación médica, Emergency response, Medical training, Lecciones aprendidas, Respuesta a emergencias, Learned lessons, Atentados multifocales, Multifocal attacks

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green