Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Clinical efficacy of two dentin desensitizing agents.

Authors: M F, Morris; R D, Davis; B W, Richardson;

Clinical efficacy of two dentin desensitizing agents.

Abstract

To compare the clinical effect over 3 months of two commercially available desensitizing agents on the level of discomfort of patients with complaints of dentin sensitivity.An oxalate-containing pre-polymerized resin suspension (Pain-Free), a 0.7% fluoride solution (DentinBloc), and a distilled water placebo were compared in a clinical setting. Ten volunteer patients exhibiting three or more teeth that were sensitive to touch and to a stream of forced air were enrolled in the study (52 teeth total). Each patient's level of sensitivity to tactile stimuli and to a forced air stream was recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS). The tactile stimulus was a metal probe rubbed across the exposed dentin with a constant pressure of 40 grams. A 1-second blast of air from a dental unit air syringe was used to generate the air stream. The desensitizing agents were applied according to manufacturers' guidelines. Sensitivity measurements were recorded at baseline, immediately after treatment, at 1 week, 1 month, and at 3 months. VAS pain scores were analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA (alpha = 0.05).The pre-polymerized resin suspension (Pain-Free), the fluoride-containing solution (DentinBloc), and the placebo all decreased dentin sensitivity. No significant difference was found among the desensitizing agents at any time period (P > 0.05).

Keywords

Adult, Male, Analysis of Variance, Dental Materials, Oxalates, Humans, Female, Dentin Sensitivity, Organic Chemicals, Pain Measurement

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    56
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
56
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!