Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Peptide-lipid interactions and mechanisms of antimicrobial peptides.

Authors: H W, Huang;

Peptide-lipid interactions and mechanisms of antimicrobial peptides.

Abstract

Hydrophobic matching, in which transmembrane proteins cause the surrounding lipid bilayer to adjust its hydrocarbon thickness to match the length of the hydrophobic surface of the protein, is a commonly accepted idea. To test this idea, gramicidin was embedded in dilauroyl phosphatidylcholine (DLPC) and dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine (DMPC) bilayers at the molar ratio 1:10. The bilayer thickness (PtP) was measured by X-ray lamellar diffraction. In the fluid phase near full hydration, PtP is 30.8 A for pure DLPC, 32.1 A for DLPC/gramicidin mixture, 35.3 A for pure DMPC and 32.7 A for a DMPC/gramicidin mixture. Gramicidin apparently stretches DLPC bilayers and thins DMPC bilayers toward a common thickness as expected by hydrophobic matching. Gramicidin pair correlations were measured by X-ray in-plane scattering. In the fluid phase, the gramicidin-gramicidin nearest-neighbour separation is 26.8 A in DLPC bilayers but shortens to 23.3 A in DMPC bilayers, thus confirming the conjecture that when proteins are embedded in a membrane, hydrophobic matching creates a strain field in the lipid bilayer that in turn gives rise to a membrane-mediated attractive potential between proteins. These results were analysed with an elasticity theory of membrane deformation. The same principle explains the 'concentration-gating' mechanism of pore formation by antimicrobial peptides via the membrane-thinning effect. Concentration-gated pore formation and membrane thinning by alamethicin and magainin have been observed.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Solubility, Lipid Bilayers, Gramicidin, Membrane Proteins, Water, Computer Simulation, Energy Metabolism, Anti-Bacterial Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    26
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
26
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!