Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

[Drug sensitivity of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis].

Authors: KANAZAWA, YUTAKA; KURAMATA, TOSHIO;

[Drug sensitivity of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis].

Abstract

Drug-sensitivity of 70 strains of Y. enterocolitica and 24 of Y. pseudotuberculosis including reference strains and isolates from men or animals were determined by the agar plate-dilution method. All the strains of Y. enterocolitica were relatively resistant to penicillins and cephalosporins, while all of Y. pseudotuberculosis were sensitive to both of the agents. Most of the strains of both species excluding 13 resistant ones were sensitive to streptomycin. The resistant strains, however, were sensitive to other aminoglycoside antibiotics, i.e. kanamycin, paromomycin, gentamicin, tobramycin, dibekacin and amikacin. All of the strains were sensitive to chloramphenicol. Most of the strains excluding 3 resistant ones were highly sensitive to tetracycline. The resistant strains were also resistant to doxycycline and methacycline but not to minocycline. All of them were resistant to erythromycin, to lincomycin and to novobiocin. Most of them excluding 7 resistant strains were sensitive to sulfisoxazole. All of them were sensitive to nalidixic acid, piromidic acid, and also to dihydroxymethylfuratrizine. A new synthetic agent, fosfomycin showed a relatively wide range of activity to the strains, but none of resistant strains were noticed. These resistant strains were all found in the isolates from men and animals but not in reference strains. Among these resistant strains, resistance patterns were as follows; TC, SM, SA in 3 of Y. enterocolitica, SM, SA in 3 of Y. enterocolitica and in 1 of Y. pseudotuberculosis, and SM in 3 of the both species, respectively. As for polypeptide antibiotics, polymyxin B and colistin, some strains of the both species showed an uncontinous susceptibility, i.e. inhibited growth at a certain lower concentration but growth at a higher concentration.

Keywords

Penicillin Resistance, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Penicillins, Yersinia, Cephalosporins, Mice, Chloramphenicol, Dogs, Kanamycin, Tetracyclines, Tobramycin, Animals, Humans, Gentamicins, Amikacin, Antibiotics, Antitubercular

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average