
Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured in 328 eyes of 167 patients (50 men and 117 women, an average age was 62 years). CCT was determinated by ultrasonic pachymeter NIDEC, design UP-1000, at Eye Department of 3rd Medical Faculty of Prague.The mean CCT at glaucoma patients was 561 microns, in margins 490-650 microns. CCT for right eyes were 0.567 +/- 0.035 mm, for left eyes 0.569 +/- 0.037 mm. There were no influence by previous operations (cataract, trabeculectomy and combined operations). NTG had the lowest CCT values 551 microns, POAG had 569 microns and OHT the greates value, CCT is 588 microns. CCT in patients with NTG was significantly lower (p = 0.047) than in POAG. The higher difference is between NTG a OHT (p = 0.015). We had no statistical difference in CCT between hypermetropic, emetropic and myopic eyes. The corneal thickness is decreasing during ageing. CCT is another clinically helpful factor for evaluation our glaucoma patients. CCT together with other risk factors can help us in establishing a target pressure. Patients after refractive surgery (PRK, LASIK) should be more carefully evaluated not to miss early stages of glaucoma.
Cornea, Male, Corneal Topography, Humans, Female, Glaucoma, Middle Aged
Cornea, Male, Corneal Topography, Humans, Female, Glaucoma, Middle Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
