
handle: 10451/32893
The diagnostic process always involves two sequential steps: the first assesses the patient's clinical situation through data obtained from the history and physical examination, and the second requests tests to confirm the diagnostic hypothesis. The first step belongs to cognitive psychology and has its own biases and learning methods. The second is based on scientific data that defines the discriminatory power of tests from studies comparing a new test (the so-called index test) and the gold standard for diagnosing the disease. In this article we present a classification of the diagnostic characteristics of tests using a 2x2 contingency table. This information can be used to support the rational use of diagnostic tests.
Evidence-based medicine, Sensitivity, Likelihood ratios, Diagnostic characteristics of tests, Specificity, Predictive values
Evidence-based medicine, Sensitivity, Likelihood ratios, Diagnostic characteristics of tests, Specificity, Predictive values
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
