
handle: 10451/26054
The article explores systematically, albeit preliminarily, the way the concepts of security and safety are employed in scholarly urban studies literature about crime (and the prevention of it). It employs network analysis on author keywords, complemented with text analysis of abstracts, over sets of bibliographic information retrieved from Web of Science. Using a critical interpretative analysis of findings, and looking at the geography of main scholarly communities in this field, the article highlights differences (especially at the operational level) and commonalities (especially at the conceptual level) in the way scholars understand urban security and urban safety. Concluding that this field of study is dominated by operational, evidence-based approaches, the article advocates for a renewed critical engagement of scholarship in this field, through studies that would shift their attention from technical ‘solutions’ to the ‘problems’ that lead societies to demand security/safety.
Simone Tulumello is funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia under grant SFRH/BPD/86394/2012. Roberto Falanga is funded by the European Commission (FP7 MOPACT “Mobilising the Potential of Active Ageing in Europe”). The authors would like to thank: Chiara Carrozza, PI of the project Being Digital, for having organized the workshop Digital Methods at the University of Coimbra (2014); the teachers of the workshop Tommaso Venturini, Paul Girard and Benjamin Ooghe-Tabanou; an anonymous reviewer, as well as the editors of this special issue, for constructive insights.
Crime prevention, Urban crime, Critical urban studies, Network analysis, Text analysis
Crime prevention, Urban crime, Critical urban studies, Network analysis, Text analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
