
handle: 10447/265067
What kind of candidate is selected into a job when the principal has to appoint a committee to measure the candidate's ability and select a winner through a call specifying a wage for the job? In a model where the principal fixes the wage anticipating the committee's choice, under a rather natural assumption about the committee's objective we find that if the committee takes into account the candidate's gratitude a candidate with less than first best ability will be selected in equilibrium. First best selection is achieved if the committee is anonymous to the candidates. If the committee could also set the wage the first best candidate would be selected, but the principal would be worse off hence he would not implement full delegation.
Candidate selection Expert appointment Gratitude and reciprocity, Gratitude and reciprocity, Principal-agent model; Selection of job candidates; Gratitude and reciprocity, Selection of job candidates, Principal-agent model
Candidate selection Expert appointment Gratitude and reciprocity, Gratitude and reciprocity, Principal-agent model; Selection of job candidates; Gratitude and reciprocity, Selection of job candidates, Principal-agent model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
