
handle: 10447/117074
Discrete choice experiments have their genesis in conjoint analysis, which was based on first-order models. For this and other reasons, discrete choice experiments in practice are usually designed for estimation of main effects. In this paper, we explore the construction of maximin model robust designs when the experimenter is concerned about the presence of interactions. We consider three classes of models—main effects models, main effects models plus first-order interactions, and secondorder models, and we construct designs that maximize the minimum efficiency of the design for the three competing models. We do so first with standard linear models and then extend our analysis to nonlinear models and, in particular, to models for discrete choice experiments. We compare our results with existing approaches in the literature, such as Li et al., 2013.
Interaction Effects, Discrete Choice Experiments; Model Robustness; Main Effects, Interaction Effects., Main Effects, Discrete Choice Experiments, Model Robustness
Interaction Effects, Discrete Choice Experiments; Model Robustness; Main Effects, Interaction Effects., Main Effects, Discrete Choice Experiments, Model Robustness
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
