Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Archivio Istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Formazione e valutazione in un laboratorio di robotica educativa nella scuola secondaria

Authors: Giganti, Marco; Baroni, Federica; Lehmann, Hagen; Folci, Ilaria; Lazzari, Marco;

Formazione e valutazione in un laboratorio di robotica educativa nella scuola secondaria

Abstract

Da un’esperienza di ricerca-azione di robotica educativa in contesti ad alta complessità, si discutono approcci, metodi, applicazioni e primi risultati di un intervento formativo-didattico che ha coinvolto docenti e studenti di due classi della secondaria di I grado della Scuola Audiofonetica di Brescia. Nella progettazione di un laboratorio STEAM sono state affrontate questioni legate alla formazione dei docenti, alla costruzione di scenari per l’introduzione di un robot sociale in contesti scolastici, alla progettazione didattica inclusiva nella prospettiva della differenziazione e alla valutazione formativa. Sono dunque state proposte agli studenti attività di coding orientate allo sviluppo della competenza digitale, del pensiero computazionale, del pensiero critico e del problem solving che hanno portato i docenti coinvolti a superare per la prima volta la prassi della valutazione sommativa per orientarsi verso strumenti integrati di autovalutazione, valutazione tra pari e valutazione esperta. I dati dei questionari somministrati agli studenti a inizio e fine anno scolastico, le interviste rivolte ai vari attori nelle diverse fasi del progetto, le osservazioni condotte sul campo durante le azioni formative e il compito finale ci portano a concludere che c’è possibilità di progettare attività di coding inclusive, diversificando proposte e linguaggi e incoraggiando forme di valutazione orientate al processo.

Based on research experience in educational robotics applied to highly complex scholastic contexts, we report approaches, methods, applications and first results of a training and teaching intervention that involved teachers and students of two classes of lower secondary school of the “Audiofonetica” of Brescia. As part of the design of a STEAM laboratory, we developed solutions concerning teacher training, the construction of scenarios for the introduction of a social robot in school contexts, inclusive educational design in the perspective of differentiation and formative assessment. Students were offered coding activities oriented towards the development of digital competence, computational thinking, critical thinking and problem solving. In consequence this has led the teachers involved to overcome for the first time the practice of summative assessment and instead to move towards integrated tools of self-, peer and expert assessment. The data from the questionnaires administered to the students at the beginning and end of the year, the interviews with various participants in the different phases of the project, the observations made during the training actions, and the final task, lead us to conclude that it is possible to design inclusive coding activities, diversifying proposals and languages and encouraging process-oriented forms of evaluation.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
Keywords

robotica educativa; formazione; valutazione; differenziazione didattica, educational robotics; training; assessment; differentiation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green