
handle: 10446/153063 , 11380/1388229
The results of standardized tests such as PISA and the Italian INVALSI, point out the existence of a gender gap in mathematics. This gap is deeply studied in mathematics educations literature. In this paper we analyse two INVALSI items of grade 10 in which male and female answers have distinctly different behaviour. Our aim is to observe if this different trend of male and female answers is influenced in particular by effects of didactic contract. In this analysis we integrate quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative analysis is based on IRT models and it allow us to highlight the trend of the correct and wrong answers, distinguishing between male and female. The qualitative analysis involves interviews to students and confirm that the choice of a particular response is influenced by didactic contract effects.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
