Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ReCiL - Repositório ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Análise micológica e quantificação de zearalenona e deoxinivalenol em alimentos compostos para suínos

Authors: Santos, Sara Maria Oliveira;

Análise micológica e quantificação de zearalenona e deoxinivalenol em alimentos compostos para suínos

Abstract

As análises micológica e micotoxicológica representam uma parte importante da monitorização da qualidade e segurança dos alimentos compostos para animais. O objectivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o nível de contaminação fúngica em amostras de alimentos compostos para suínos, identificar as espécies fúngicas presentes e quantificar os níveis de zearalenona (ZEA) e deoxinivalenol (DON). Para tal, foram analisadas 55 amostras, encontrando-se 52 (94.5%) contaminadas com fungos, apresentando teores médios de 1.7×104 UFC/g. Os fungos mais predominantes foram o Fusarium spp (81.8%), o Aspergillus flavus (69.0%), as leveduras (60.0%) e o Aspergillus candidus (56.3%). A análise micotoxicológica foi efectuada por Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Performance (HPLC), com purificação por colunas IAC (Colunas de imunoafinidade), e revelou 18 amostras positivas para ZEA e 13 positivas para DON, com níveis de ZEA variando entre 6.1 e 5.4×101 μg/kg, e de DON variando de 1.0×102 e 9.0×102 μg/kg. Foi observada co-ocorrência em 3 amostras (5.5%). Todos os resultados encontrados estavam abaixo dos limites máximos permitidos pela União Europeia (UE). As taxas de recuperação para amostras contaminadas com ZEA, a concentrações de 0.005; 0.010 e 0.10 μg/kg foram de 93.0; 95.0 e 95.0%, respectivamente e as de DON foram de 98.0; 85.0 e 88.0%, para soluções contaminadas com 100.0; 250.0 e 500.0 μg/kg, respectivamente.

Mycological and mycotoxicological analysis represents an important part in monitorization of feed´s quality and security. The aim of this work was to evaluate the contamination levels of mycobiota in swine feed samples, identify the mycobiota species present, and to quantify the levels of zearalenone (ZEA) and deoxinivalenol (DON). For such, 55 samples were analysed, 52 samples (94.5%) found with fungi contamination, with a mean of 1.7×104 UFC/g. The most predominant fungi were Fusarium sp (81.8%), Aspergillus flavus (69.0%), yeasts (60.0 %) and Aspergillus candidus (56.3 %). The mycotoxicological analysis was performed by High performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), with Immunoaffinity Columns (IAC) purification, and revealed 18 samples positive for ZEA and 13 positive for DON, with levels ranging between 6.1 to 5.4×101 µg/kg of ZEA and 1.0×102 to 9.0×102 µg/kg for DON. It was observed co-occurrence in 3 samples (5.5%). All the results found were bellow the maximum limits permitted by European Union (EU). The recovery taxs for samples contaminated with ZEA at concentration´s level of 0.005; 0.010 and 0.10 µg/kg were 93.0; 95.0 and 95.0%, respectively and DON recovery taxs were 98.0; 85.0 and 88.0%, for spiking concentrations of 100.0; 250.0 and 500.0 µg/kg of DON, respectively.

Orientação: Hermínia Marina Lourdes Martins ; co-orientação: Cláudia Sofia Antunes Ferreira 

Country
Portugal
Related Organizations
Keywords

ANIMAL FEEDING, MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA, SUÍNOS, VETERINÁRIA, VETERINARY MEDICINE, CHROMATOGRAPHY, ALIMENTAÇÃO ANIMAL, SWINE, CROMATOGRAFIA, MESTRADO INTEGRADO EM MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green