Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the management of azoospermia].

Authors: V, Izard; N, Thiounn; C, Poirot; A, Bouker; S, Epelboin; J R, Zorn; P, Jouannet; +3 Authors

[Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the management of azoospermia].

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyse all attempts of ICSI performed in our centre between 1995 and 1997 with surgically harvested sperm for the treatment of secretory and excretory azoospermia.71 infertile couples, in which the man suffered from secretory (n = 8) or excretory azoospermia (n = 63), were managed with 94 attempts of ICSI.ICSI was able to be performed 85 times with 82 embryo transfers resulting in 29 clinical pregnancies. The clinical pregnancy rate per ICSI attempt was comparable with sperm obtained on the day of ICSI or previously harvested and frozen (30.5% and 31.4% respectively). The clinical pregnancy rate per ICSI attempt was 33.3% for testicular sperm (n = 18), and 30.3% for epididymal sperm (n = 76). Twenty-seven clinical pregnancies (32.1%) were obtained for men with excretory azoospermia (47.2% for vas deferens agenesis and 20.8% for acquired urinary tract obstruction, p = 0.01), and 2 (20%) for men with secretory azoospermia.ICSI can achieve pregnancy in infertile couples in whom no other solution can be considered. Cryopreservation allows surgical harvesting to be dissociated from ICSI without decreasing the pregnancy rate, justifying freezing of sperm during any surgical procedure on the seminal tract. The better results obtained in congenital excretory azoospermia compared to acquired obstructions, usually post-infectious, suggest a harmful effect of infection on the quality of sperm.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Microinjections, Pregnancy Outcome, Fertilization in Vitro, Oligospermia, Middle Aged, Embryo Transfer, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!