
handle: 10419/77364
This paper reports on an extensive Monte Carlo study of seven residual-based tests of the hypothesis of no cointegration. Critical values and the power of the tests under the alternative of fractional cointegration are simulated and compared. It turns out that the Phillips-Perron t-test when applied to regression residuals is more powerful than Geweke-Porter-Hudak tests and the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test. Only the Modified Rescaled Range test is more powerful than the Phillips-Perron test in a few situations. Moreover in large samples, the power of the Phillips-Perron test increases if a time trend is included in the cointegrating regression.
Geweke-Porter-Hudak test, Modified rescaled range test, Fractional cointegration, Augmented Dickey- Fuller test, ddc:519, Monte Carlo experiment, Phillips-Perron test, Fractional cointegration,Monte Carlo experiment,Geweke-Porter-Hudak test,Modified rescaled range test,Phillips-Perron test,Augmented Dickey- Fuller test
Geweke-Porter-Hudak test, Modified rescaled range test, Fractional cointegration, Augmented Dickey- Fuller test, ddc:519, Monte Carlo experiment, Phillips-Perron test, Fractional cointegration,Monte Carlo experiment,Geweke-Porter-Hudak test,Modified rescaled range test,Phillips-Perron test,Augmented Dickey- Fuller test
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
