
handle: 10419/56774
In contrast to the present consensus view of stabilization policy, theoretical and empirical research strongly support the consideration of supply-side adjustment to pronounced variations of factor-utilization in order to trace a more realistic pattern of macroeconomic adjustment dynamics within simulation studies. Against this background, our paper seeks to illuminate the relevance of endogenous supply-side adjustment for monetary policy research. We modify a basic New Keynesian model by explicitly considering demand-side stimulus on the evolution of productive capacity and analyze stability, impulse response, and welfare issues if the central bank follows a simple monetary policy rule. Thereby, we control for the robustness of our policy implications by various states of output gap mismeasurement the central bank might be confronted with. We find that, in contrast to a basic New Keynesian Model, output gap stabilization plays a more prominent role when potential output is endogenous.
endogenous potential output, Monetary policy, factor-utilization, endogenous potential output, output gap mismeasurement, Geldpolitik, 330, Economics, ddc:330, monetary policy, Neukeynesianische Makroökonomik, Konjunkturpolitik, output gap mismeasurement, Zinspolitik, Monetary policy, monetary policy, factor-utilization, endogenous potential output, output gap mismeasurement, E50, Regelgebundene Politik, E52, E32, factor-utilization, Gesamtwirtschaftliche Produktionstheorie, jel: jel:E50, jel: jel:E32, jel: jel:E52, ddc: ddc:330
endogenous potential output, Monetary policy, factor-utilization, endogenous potential output, output gap mismeasurement, Geldpolitik, 330, Economics, ddc:330, monetary policy, Neukeynesianische Makroökonomik, Konjunkturpolitik, output gap mismeasurement, Zinspolitik, Monetary policy, monetary policy, factor-utilization, endogenous potential output, output gap mismeasurement, E50, Regelgebundene Politik, E52, E32, factor-utilization, Gesamtwirtschaftliche Produktionstheorie, jel: jel:E50, jel: jel:E32, jel: jel:E52, ddc: ddc:330
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
