
handle: 10419/55243
"The requirement of positive marginal utility only makes it possible to derive a restricted twofund separation theorem for portfolio selection problems replacing the original separation theorem of Cass and Stiglitz (1970). We use our findings for a re-examination of the bias-in-beta problem in mutual funds performance evaluation and of the relevance of the standard CAPM without borrowing restrictions. We also present empirical evidence for the only limited validity of the separation theorem when explicitly recognizing positive marginal utility. Moreover, quadratic utility functions are not apt to approximate the admissible range of risk preferences in the case of higher-order utility functions." (author's abstract)
Kapital, two-fund separation, capital, Economics, Nutzen, costs, positive marginal utility, Preis, empirische Forschung, G11, Portfolio-Management, two-fund separation,HARA utility,positive marginal utility,borrowing restrictions,Capital Asset Pricing Model, bias in beta, performance evaluation, Forschung, research, ddc:330, Investition, 10900, Wirtschaft, empirical research, investment, borrowing restrictions, price, HARA utility, Kosten, Capital Asset Pricing Model, bias in beta, performance evaluation, Wirtschaftspolitik, utility, Economic Policy, portfolio management, performance assessment, Leistungsbewertung, ddc: ddc:330, jel: jel:G11
Kapital, two-fund separation, capital, Economics, Nutzen, costs, positive marginal utility, Preis, empirische Forschung, G11, Portfolio-Management, two-fund separation,HARA utility,positive marginal utility,borrowing restrictions,Capital Asset Pricing Model, bias in beta, performance evaluation, Forschung, research, ddc:330, Investition, 10900, Wirtschaft, empirical research, investment, borrowing restrictions, price, HARA utility, Kosten, Capital Asset Pricing Model, bias in beta, performance evaluation, Wirtschaftspolitik, utility, Economic Policy, portfolio management, performance assessment, Leistungsbewertung, ddc: ddc:330, jel: jel:G11
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
