
handle: 10419/31374
When looked at individually there is little reason to think that economists lack integrity and are dishonest. Yet, when we look at academic papers written by economists we can see biases. This paper tries to reconcile these two observations by arguing that the constraints the profession sets on permitted practices are loose enough to allow economists to maintain their biases while conforming to the mores of their profession. There is little reason to think that economics is worse in this respect than some other fields.
honesty, integrity, culture of economics, significance tests, data mining, ddc:330, culture of economics, data mining, Honesty, B41, integrity, significance tests, A14, jel: jel:A, jel: jel:B
honesty, integrity, culture of economics, significance tests, data mining, ddc:330, culture of economics, data mining, Honesty, B41, integrity, significance tests, A14, jel: jel:A, jel: jel:B
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
