Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
EconStorarrow_drop_down
EconStor
Research . 2024
Data sources: EconStor
addClaim

The revision of the Posted Workers Directive

Authors: Seikel, Daniel;

The revision of the Posted Workers Directive

Abstract

In 2018, after years of political struggle, the European Parliament and the European Council agreed on a revision of the Posted Workers Directive from 1996. Given the fundamental differences of interest among EU member states on the topic of posted workers, this event must come as a surprise considering the high procedural hurdles of European decision-making. At first glance, the revision of the Posted Workers Directive challenges the political economic integration literature. Therefore, this article explores how and why the proponents of the revision were able to prevail. To this end, the article conducts a theory-testing process tracing analysis to reveal the mechanisms that enabled the success of the proponents of the revision. The analysis shows that the revision can be explained by consensus-facilitating mechanisms that are in line with the theoretical expectations of the political economic integration literature. In addition, the proponents of the revision benefited from extraordinary historical circumstances and coincidental events. This points to the historic contingency of the circumstances under which the revision became feasible. Thus, the revision of the Posted Workers Directive confirms the explanatory power of political economic perspectives on European integration. The findings allow to draw conclusions about whether, how and under which circumstances the obstacles of market-correcting measures at the European level can be overcome.

Keywords

ddc:330

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Fields of Science
Fields of Science
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!