Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ MPG.PuRearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
MPG.PuRe
Research . 2019
Data sources: MPG.PuRe
EconStor
Research . 2019
Data sources: EconStor
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Uncertain futures: Imaginaries, narratives, and calculative technologies

Authors: Beckert, J.; Bronk, R.;

Uncertain futures: Imaginaries, narratives, and calculative technologies

Abstract

Kapitalistische Ökonomien sind durch unablässige Neuerung gekennzeichnet. Innovationen zeigen eine Unbestimmtheit, die nicht auf meßbares Risiko reduziert werden kann. Wie bilden Akteure in der Wirtschaft Erwartungen und legen ihre Handlungen im Angesicht dieser Ungewissheit fest? Der Beitrag befasst sich mit der Rolle von Vorstellungen, Narrativen und kalkulativen Techniken in der Wirtschaft und zeigt, dass die Bedeutung verwendeter kalkulativer Instrumente, sozial geteilter Narrative und kontingenter Vorstellungen eine neue Form „narrativer Wirtschaftswissenschaft“ und einer Theorie fiktionaler (anstelle von rationalen) Erwartungen notwendig macht. Wenn Erwartungen nicht in objektiven Wahrscheinlichkeitsfunktionen verankert werden können, gehört die Zukunft denjenigen, die über die marktliche, politische oder rhetorische Macht verfügen, ihren Erzählungen Geltung zu verschaffen. Der Beitrag befasst sich im letzten Teil mit den Gefahren analytischer Monokulturen und dem Diskurs zu „best practices“ in durch Ungewissheit gekennzeichneten Situationen und leitet daraus einige Schlussfolgerungen für das Verständnis von Populismus ab.

Dynamic capitalist economies are characterised by relentless innovation and novelty and hence exhibit an indeterminacy that cannot be reduced to measurable risk. How then do economic actors form expectations and decide how to act despite this uncertainty? This paper focuses on the role played by imaginaries, narratives, and calculative technologies, and argues that the market impact of shared calculation devices, social narratives, and contingent imaginaries underlines the rationale for a new form of ‘narrative economics’ and a theory of fictional (rather than rational) expectations. When expectations cannot be anchored in objective probability functions, the future belongs to those with the market, political, or rhetorical power to make their models or stories count. The paper also explores the dangers of analytical monocultures and the discourse of best practice in conditions of uncertainty, and considers the link between uncertainty and some aspects of populism.

Contents 1 Fictional expectations and other working fictions 2 Radical uncertainty and the implications for economics 3 Expectations in conditions of uncertainty 4 Narratives 5 The dangers of analytical monocultures 6 Re-imagining economics 7 The politics of uncertain futures References

Keywords

calculation, future, Ungewissheit, ddc:300, narrative economics, fiktionale Erwartungen, Zukunft, Vorstellungen, innovation, fictional expectations, imaginaries, Kalkulation, narrative Wirtschaftswissenschaften, uncertainty, Innovation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green