
handle: 10419/198289
The purpose of this article is to analyze the relationship between the discipline of Behavioural Economics and the Neoclassical School. On the basis of the available literature, the paper aims to investigate if the two branches are totally opposite, or if the behavioural theories only extend and complement the mainstream economics.
economic behaviour, behavioural economics; mainstream economics; economic behaviour, ddc:330, JF20-2112, behavioural economics, D01, mainstream economics, D03, Political institutions and public administration (General), jel: jel:D01, jel: jel:D03
economic behaviour, behavioural economics; mainstream economics; economic behaviour, ddc:330, JF20-2112, behavioural economics, D01, mainstream economics, D03, Political institutions and public administration (General), jel: jel:D01, jel: jel:D03
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
