
handle: 10419/198205
In the current context of globalization, we can no longer talk about increasing organizational value ignoring the interests of shareholders, employees, business partners, etc. Such interests may come into conflict, leading to internal conflicts, with negative influence on the entity’s performance. To avoid such discrepancies, a responsible behavior from managers is increasingly necessary, which means, in fact, adopting a corporate governance model.The aim of this article is to make a comparative study between the main corporate governance models used globally by analyzing strengths and weaknesses for each one, in the sense to determine which one is the best model and if it can be adapted to different economic systems, in order to be applied on a scale as large. We used a bibliographic method for our research is the one. Literature does not provide concrete answers to this problem, most authors treating each one the governance model specific to their home country.
model, M14, ddc:330, M41, corporate governance, market, efficiency Romania, O16, efficiency, JF20-2112, corporate governance, model, control, market, efficiency Romania, G34, Political institutions and public administration (General), control, jel: jel:G34, jel: jel:M41, jel: jel:M14, jel: jel:O16
model, M14, ddc:330, M41, corporate governance, market, efficiency Romania, O16, efficiency, JF20-2112, corporate governance, model, control, market, efficiency Romania, G34, Political institutions and public administration (General), control, jel: jel:G34, jel: jel:M41, jel: jel:M14, jel: jel:O16
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
