
handle: 10419/150286 , 11336/60966
We propose a simple criterion to compare generalized median voter schemes according to their manipulability. We identify three necessary and sufficient conditions for the comparability of two generalized median voter schemes in terms of their vulnerability to manipulation. The three conditions are stated using the two associated families of monotonic fixed ballots and depend very much on the power each agent has to unilaterally change the outcomes of the two generalized median voter schemes. We perform a specific analysis of all median voter schemes: the anonymous subfamily of generalized median voter schemes.
Altres ajuts: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas PIP 112-200801-00655
Altres ajuts: Universidad Nacional de San Luis mitjançant subvenció 319502
GENERALIZED MEDIAN VOTING SCHEMES, anonymity, Strategy-proofness, ddc:330, Generalized Median Voting Schemes; Strategy-proofness; Anonymity., Generalized Median Voting Schemes, Generalized median voting schemes, strategy-proofness, generalized median voting schemes, strategy-proofness, anonymity, Generalized median voting schemes, strategy-proofness, anonymity, generalized median voting schemes, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.1, D78, Voting theory, Vot -- Models matemàtics, ANONYMITY, STRATEGY-PROOFNESS, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Anonymity, C78, jel: jel:C78, jel: jel:D78
GENERALIZED MEDIAN VOTING SCHEMES, anonymity, Strategy-proofness, ddc:330, Generalized Median Voting Schemes; Strategy-proofness; Anonymity., Generalized Median Voting Schemes, Generalized median voting schemes, strategy-proofness, generalized median voting schemes, strategy-proofness, anonymity, Generalized median voting schemes, strategy-proofness, anonymity, generalized median voting schemes, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.1, D78, Voting theory, Vot -- Models matemàtics, ANONYMITY, STRATEGY-PROOFNESS, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, Anonymity, C78, jel: jel:C78, jel: jel:D78
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
