
handle: 10419/150165 , 11565/3719341
Battigalli and Siniscalchi (2002) formalize the idea of forward induction reasoning as "rationality and common strong belief of rationality" (RCSBR). Here, we study the behavioral implications of RCSBR across all type structures. Formally, we show that RCSBR is characterized by a solution concept we call Extensive Form Best Response Sets (EFBRS's). It turns out that the EFBRS concept is equivalent to a concept already proposed in the literature, namely Directed Rationalizability. (See Battigalli and Siniscalchi 2003.) We conclude by applying the EFBRS concept to games of interest.
C72, directed rationalizability, ddc:330, Epistemic game theory, forward induction, extensive form best response set, directed rationalizability, Epistemic Game Theory; Forward Induction; Extensive Form Best Response Set; Directed Rationalizability, extensive form best response set, Epistemic game theory, forward induction, jel: jel:C72
C72, directed rationalizability, ddc:330, Epistemic game theory, forward induction, extensive form best response set, directed rationalizability, Epistemic Game Theory; Forward Induction; Extensive Form Best Response Set; Directed Rationalizability, extensive form best response set, Epistemic game theory, forward induction, jel: jel:C72
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
