
handle: 10419/150088 , 1807/9512
We present a model of participation in large elections in which the formation of voter groups is endogenous. Partisan citizens decide whether to become leaders (activists) and try to persuade impressionable citizens to vote for the leaders' preferred party. In the (unique) pure strategy equilibrium, the number of leaders favoring each party depends on the cost of activism and the importance of the election. In turn, the expected turnout and the winning margin in an election depend on the number of leaders and the strength of social interactions. The model predicts a nonmonotonic relationship between the expected turnout and the winning margin in large elections.
endogenous leaders, winning margin, D72, ddc:330, Voter mobilization, Voter mobilization, endogenous leaders, turnout, winning margin, Vote´x Paradox, Endogenous Leaders, Turnout, Winning Margin, Voter's Paradox, Endogenous Leaders, turnout, jel: jel:D72
endogenous leaders, winning margin, D72, ddc:330, Voter mobilization, Voter mobilization, endogenous leaders, turnout, winning margin, Vote´x Paradox, Endogenous Leaders, Turnout, Winning Margin, Voter's Paradox, Endogenous Leaders, turnout, jel: jel:D72
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
