
handle: 10419/102563
This paper proposes a methodology for default probability estimation for low default portfolios, where the statistical inference may become troublesome. The author suggests using logistic regression models with the Bayesian estimation of parameters. The piecewise logistic regression model and Box-Cox transformation of credit risk score is used to derive the estimates of probability of default, which extends the work by Neagu et al. (2009). The paper shows that the Bayesian models are more accurate in statistical terms, which is evaluated based on Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test, Hosmer et al. (2013).
default probability, ddc:330, goodness-of-fit, logistic regression, C51, C52, G10, default probability, bayesian analysis, logistic regression, goodness-of-fit, bayesian analysis, C11, jel: jel:C52, jel: jel:C51, jel: jel:C11, jel: jel:G10
default probability, ddc:330, goodness-of-fit, logistic regression, C51, C52, G10, default probability, bayesian analysis, logistic regression, goodness-of-fit, bayesian analysis, C11, jel: jel:C52, jel: jel:C51, jel: jel:C11, jel: jel:G10
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
