
The validity of a coproantigen ELISA for Echinococcus multilocularis was evaluated by comparison of three diagnostic methods; autopsy, egg examination and the ELISA. Of 71 foxes, 39 were found to be infected with the cestode at autopsy. The overall mean of worm burdens was 3,451, but the number varied (1-34,522). The ELISA could detect 94.9% (37/39) of the worm positives and there were no false-positives. Two false-negatives were infected with 1 and 4 cestodes, whereas 3 cases with similar worm burdens (2, 4 and 6 worms) were diagnosed as positives. This indicates the detection limit of the assay may be equivalent to less than 10 (in the worm burden). On the other hand, egg examination showed low sensitivity (43.6%, 17/39). These results suggest the ELISA has a potential to replace for the conventional methods.
diagnosis, oproantigen, Foxes, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Echinococcus, Echinococcosis, Antigens, Helminth, 649, Intestine, Small, Animals, Echinococcus multilocularis, False Positive Reactions, Female, Autopsy, Parasite Egg Count
diagnosis, oproantigen, Foxes, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Echinococcus, Echinococcosis, Antigens, Helminth, 649, Intestine, Small, Animals, Echinococcus multilocularis, False Positive Reactions, Female, Autopsy, Parasite Egg Count
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
