Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Transabdominal Preperitoneal Procedure.

Authors: , Schultz; , Cartuill; , Graber; , Hickok;

Transabdominal Preperitoneal Procedure.

Abstract

The technique of transperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy evolved its principles for success through the process of continuous quality improvement. Between December 21, 1989 and December 20, 1993, 278 patients had repair of 348 inguinal and/or femoral hernias using any of four transperitoneal methods. Group I had mesh repair of only the visualized defect; Group II had mesh support of the entire inguinofemoral area; Group III had staple fixation of mesh as in Group I; whereas Group IV had staple fixation of mesh as in Group II. Recurrence rates were 23% in Group I at 4 years, Group II had 6% at 3(1/2) years, Group III had 33% at 3 years, and Group IV had 0% at 3 years. On average, patients returned to unrestricted activity in 4.5 days. The most significant complication was that of small bowel obstruction secondary to partial or complete peritoneal flap dehiscence. These continuously scrutinized data resulted in elucidation of the principles of successful repair. They include, complete dissection and mesh coverage of the entire inguinofemoral area regardless of where the visualized defect presents, staple fixation of mesh to prevent its displacement, and close reapproximation of the peritoneal edges. For the past 3 years, adherence to these principles has resulted in 0% recurrence rates and prompt resumption of activity.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!