Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ uBibliorum Repositor...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

A nova direita radical americana

O "Movimento Tea Party" : entre a homogeneidade e a heterogeneidade política
Authors: Jerónimo, Jérémy Silvares;

A nova direita radical americana

Abstract

The main objective of this dissertation is to demonstrate the heterogeneity that exists inside the Tea Party Movement – a north-american political movement appeared in 2009, today integrated in the Republican Party – as much in its ideology as in its structure. The bibliographical research, a detailed analysis of each faction (libertarian and religious) and an analyses of the structure of this movement will allow us to answer a series of crucial questions and will help us to a better understanding of the purpose of this investigation. We will have the opportunity to check that the ideology of the two biggest existent factions inside the Tea Party – the libertarian faction and the religious faction – share distinct political ideas and purposes: the libertarian are mostly concerned with the economy and the religious tea partiers are more concerned with the social conditions and moral values. About the Tea Party structure, there are a large number of groups and local organizations independent from each other, as well as the lack of a truly political oligarchy which is shown in this investigation. Therefore, we will have the possibility to conclude that the Tea Party movement is not homogeneous but heterogeneous. We will then analyze what consequences could come from this and with the help of these facts, a possible future of this political movement.

Esta dissertação tem como principal objetivo demonstrar a heterogeneidade existente no seio do Movimento Tea Party - movimento político norte-americano surgido em 2009, integrado atualmente no Partido Republicano - tanto ao nível da sua ideologia como da sua estrutura. A pesquisa bibliográfica e a análise minuciosa de cada fação (libertários e religiosos) e da estrutura do Movimento possibilita-nos responder a uma série de questões, fulcrais, para uma melhor compreensão do objeto desta investigação. Ao nível da ideologia, teremos a oportunidade de verificar que as duas maiores fações existentes no seio deste Movimento, a libertária e a religiosa, partilham ideias e objetivos políticos distintos: económicos para os libertários; sociais e morais para os tea partiers religiosos. Relativamente à estrutura do Tea Party, uma multitude de grupos e organizações locais independentes umas das outras, bem como, a ausência de uma verdadeira oligarquia política, é visível nesta investigação. Consequentemente teremos a possibilidade de concluir que o Movimento Tea Party não é homogéneo mas antes heterogéneo, realizando de seguida, uma análise sobre quais as consequências que daí advirão, projetando com estes dados o possível futuro deste Movimento político.

Country
Portugal
Related Organizations
Keywords

Movimento Tea Party - Estados Unidos da América - 2009, Movimento Tea Party - Ideologia, Movimento Tea Party - Estrutura, Partido republicano - Movimento Tea Party - Estados Unidos da América

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 88
    download downloads 36
  • 88
    views
    36
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
88
36
Green