Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ uBibliorum Repositor...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Sociedade digital

O poder da multidão participativa
Authors: Silva, Vanessa Toste Soares da;

Sociedade digital

Abstract

Actualmente estamos a trasformar-nos numa sociedade cada vez mais ligada ao mundo digital, nas suas mais diversas formas, através dos dispositivos avançados que a tecnologia disponibiliza no mercado. Este tipo de sociedade, exactamente por viver no digital grande parte da sua vida, irá também atribuir um grande valor e importância aos conteúdos. Os conteúdos modificam-se constantemente, mas são a base da Web 2.0 e, por isso, são o que a define e aos seus utilizadores; de tal modo que acabam por influenciar culturas e a forma como o utilizador escolhe relacionar-se com os seus pares. Esta troca de conteúdos e informações entre diversos utilizadores de diferentes culturas é potencializada pelo aparecimento das Redes Sociais, que juntam em comunidades online uma enorme quantidade de indivíduos ávidos por produtos e serviços que incluam “personalização”, “proximidade” e “participação”. A Web 2.0, com todos os seus meios de divulgação e produção democratizados e as suas Redes Sociais deu origem a práticas de trabalho e produção em conjunto, que vieram mudar a forma como são hoje desenvolvidos variados projectos. O “conteúdo gerado por utilizador”, a “angariação de multidão” (“crowdsourcing”) e o “financiamento por parte da multidão” (“crowdfunding”) são algumas das actividades melhor sucedidas neste novo panorama. O conteúdo devolve o papel de produtor ao utilizador, criando-se assim uma enorme variedade de conteúdos individualizados, enquanto a angariação e o financiamento provam que, em conjunto, a multidão pode produzir de forma eficaz e organizada, aliviando marcas e empresas de custos económicos, ou até mesmo juntando recursos para que possam investir noutros utilizadores. Envolvidos nas práticas acima descritas, aparecem diversos tipos de figuras, e utilizadores, tais como os “prosumidores”, os “pro-am” e os “carreiristas em série”; munidos de meios com qualidade mais do que suficiente para produzir produtos e conteúdos por parâmetros profissionais, estes utilizadores modificarão o contexto em que se procura e exerce uma profissão.

Currently, we’re becoming a society more connected to the digital world, in its various forms, through the advanced devices that technology places on the market. This kind of society, exactly for living a big part of its life in the digital, will also assign a great importance to content. Contents change constantly, but they’re the basis of Web 2.0 and for that what defines it and its users, so that they define their culture and the way they’ll choose to relate with others. This exchange of content and information between several users from different cultures was potentiated by the appearance of Social Networks that put together in online communities a huge quantity of avid individuals for “customization”, “proximity” and “participation”. Web 2.0, with all its democratized means of divulgation and production and its Social Networks, gave rise to work and production as a group, that came to change the way projects are developed today. “User generated content”, “crowdsourcing” and “crowdfunding” are some of the activities that succeeded in this new perspective. The first one gives back to the individual the role of producer, creating a lot of new individualized contents, whereas the others prove that in a organized group a crowd can produce effectively, relieving brands and companies of economic costs, or even putting together resources so they can invest in other individuals. Involved in the practices described above, different types of users appear : “prosumers”, “proams” and “serial-careers” are some examples; bearing means with more than enough quality to produce products and content by professional parameters, this will modify the context in which we search and practice a profession.

Country
Portugal
Related Organizations
Keywords

Web 2.0, Pro-am, Crowdsourcing (angariação de multidão) - Redes sociais, Prosumidor, Crowdfunding (multidão financia), Conteúdos - Produtor - Consumidor, Sociedade digital

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 60
    download downloads 2K
  • 60
    views
    2K
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
60
2K
Green