Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Universidade de Lisb...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
UTL Repository
Master thesis . 2025
Data sources: UTL Repository
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Probability of default: modelling and backtesting

Authors: Grangeia, Rafael Ferreira;

Probability of default: modelling and backtesting

Abstract

Basel III introduced the Internal Rating Based (IRB) and IRB-Advanced (IRBA) approaches, which allow banks to use their own internal estimates of risk parameters to calculate the necessary regulatory capital requirements for credit risk. While the IRB approach enable banks to create and utilize sophisticated risk models adapted to their unique experiences and data, the IRBA methodology grants banks even greater discretion, allowing them to estimate all risk components independently, provided they meet specific criteria and obtain regulatory approval. Backtesting is a crucial process in financial risk management, employed to assess the performance and reliability of models over time. This practice is essential for maintaining robust risk management systems and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. By comparing predicted risk estimates with actual outcomes, backtesting helps in identifying discrepancies, ensuring that models remain accurate and relevant under changing market conditions. The Probability of Default (PD) parameter is a risk input that measures the likelihood that a borrower will default on their debt obligations in a specific date. This report focuses on the development of a PD model and its subsequent validation through Backtesting, ensuring its alignment with regulatory standards. The PD model development followed a structured approach, utilizing logistic regression combined with K-means clustering to form distinct risk classes, each assigned a specific PD. A scoring system was designed to rank obligors by risk, incorporating the Margin of Conservatism (MoC) to provide a buffer against potential risk underestimations, thereby enhancing model reliability. The backtesting framework was evaluated on four dimensions: stability, discriminatory power, calibration accuracy, and conservatism. Three scenarios were simulated to test the model's robustness. Results indicated that the PD model generally maintained stability and discriminatory power, though calibration issues and heterogeneity in clusters were observed. The model was conservative, overestimating risk.

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Country
Portugal
Keywords

Cluster, Dimensions, Credit Risk, Probability of Default, Backtesting

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green