
handle: 10400.5/98885
This article investigates the influence of Joachim of Fiore’s thinking and of the subsequent Joachimites on the work of António Vieira, SJ (1608-1697). My purpose is to ascertain whether Vieira provides a distinctive eschatological interpretation of the sacred texts in the unfinished Clavis Prophetarum, which deserves recognition as such in intellectual and religious history, or whether he was so much under the influence of Joachimite thinking that he ought to be considered a Joachimite himself. The hypothesis that I will explore is that Vieira might have profited from and somehow merged ideas deriving both from Augustine and Joachim, concerning the interpretation of the content of the books of Daniel and Revelation and the date of establishment of the divine kingdom on earth. This study sheds light on Vieira’s views and, more generally, on potentially important but thus far under-investigated intellectual connections between Augustine, Joachim, and Vieira.
This research was funded in whole or in part by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT, https://ror.org/00snfqn5816) under Grant CEECIND/00139/2017
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
Joachim de Fiore, António Vieira, SJ, Clavis Prophetarum
Joachim de Fiore, António Vieira, SJ, Clavis Prophetarum
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
