Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10400.5/29671
Desde a independência do continente, África tem recebido especial atenção para o seu desenvolvimento e crescimento. A primeira tentativa, através do denominado “Consenso de Washington”, foi trazida pelos países do Ocidente e focada em ideais de liberalização, desregulação e privatização. Estas ideias aplicadas em democracias tão recentes e Estados ainda frágeis demonstraram-se ineficazes. Este falhanço rompeu a já pouca confiança que o continente tinha para com os governos ocidentais e permitiu que novos atores no campo do desenvolvimento pudessem emergir, especialmente numa Cooperação Sul-Sul. A partir do novo século, a China começou a aprofundar as suas relações com o continente africano, apresentando-se como uma alternativa ao já fatigado modelo de desenvolvimento tradicional. A não-condicionalidade, o respeito e a história mútua anti-colonialista tornavam o gigante asiático um parceiro cativante para África. A China era assim colocada sobre escrutínio pelos tradicionais doadores quanto à forma como atuava no espaço africano. O Consenso de Pequim, assim denominado para contrastar o Consenso de Washington, viria a contestar a influência ocidental em África e contribuir para a bipolarização entre as duas principais potências.
Since the continent’s independence, Africa has received special attention regarding its development and growth. The first attempt, through the so-called “Washington Consensus”, was brought on by Western countries and focused on the ideals of liberalisation, deregulation and privatisation. These ideals, applied to such young democracies and fragile States, proved ineffective. This failure ruptured the little trust the continent already had on western governments and allowed for new actors in the field of development to emerge, especially in the South-South cooperation. Starting in the new century, China began to deepen its relations with the African continent, presenting itself as an alternative to the bygone traditional development model. Non-conditionality, respect and a history of mutual anti-colonialism made the Asian giant an attractive partner to Africa. China was thus put into scrutiny by traditional donors for the way it operated in Africa. “The Beijing Consensus”, named to emphasise a contrast to its counterpart the Washington Consensus, would challenge Western influence in Africa and contribute to the bipolarization between two main powers.
Mestrado Bolonha em Desenvolvimento e Cooperação Internacional
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Modelo Chinês, África, Cooperação Sul-Sul, Beijing Consensus, Chinese Model, Africa, Consenso de Pequim, Consenso de Washington, South-South Cooperation, Transparency, Transparência, Washington Consensus
Modelo Chinês, África, Cooperação Sul-Sul, Beijing Consensus, Chinese Model, Africa, Consenso de Pequim, Consenso de Washington, South-South Cooperation, Transparency, Transparência, Washington Consensus
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 29 | |
| downloads | 15 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts