Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Universidade de Lisb...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
UTL Repository
Master thesis . 2023
Data sources: UTL Repository
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Combined loss reserving and premium rating by GLM

Authors: Mensah, Joel Agbo;

Combined loss reserving and premium rating by GLM

Abstract

Generalised linear models(GLM) are routinely used in two different areas of actuarial work: Loss Reserving and Premium rating. There is little overlap between the two areas: Loss Reserving models attempt to model the development of claims but pays little attention to effect of risk variables. Premium Rating model attempt to model the effect of risk variables on claim patterns (frequency and/or severity), but usually assumes that the claims analysed are fully developed. In this dissertation, we aim to bridge the gap between these two areas of actuarial work by developing a Premium Rating model that incorporates risk variables. Specifically, we will consider demographic characteristics such as gender on claim patterns. By doing so, we hope to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that contribute to insurance claims and improve insurers' ability to accurately price their policies, something which can be done in GLM but not in the original Chain Ladder or Bornheutter-Ferguson methods. The GLM approach is applied to real-life statistics of a professional health insurance that is sold to two risk groups, females and males. The results show that with the inclusion of the risk_group variable in the GLM model framework, females have higher claim cost per insured than males, plus that the number of females is increasing while the number of males is falling. The increase of the proportion of females is partly explained by the fact that more females are entering the profession. In a competitive market, the insurance company could risk adverse selection, if at the same time as more women enter, the lower risk group (males) starts falling because premiums are becoming too high. EU regulation does not allow insurers to differentiate premiums by sex. Therefore, the insurance will have to find other ways than premium differentiation, to prevent or reduce adverse selection. It is not my purpose to suggest what the company could do. The purpose of this dissertation is to demonstrate that the use of a GLM in loss reserving may show up facts that would remain concealed if one only used a simple chain ladder method on the aggregate statistics. The theoretical base of the work is standard; its challenges lies in applying GLM to realistic datasets and studying the results.

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Mestrado Bolonha em Actuarial Science

Country
Portugal
Keywords

Bornhuetter-Ferguson, Chain ladder, Risk group, GLM

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 117
    download downloads 303
  • 117
    views
    303
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
117
303
Green
Related to Research communities